I caught up on some reading last night. A pile of newspapers that accumulated in my front room. A article in the 'Conversation' section in The Indianapolis Star caught my attention - "Marriage ban distracts from economic goals" written by Angela F. Braley, John C Lechleiter, David Simon, Jeffery H. Smulyan, and Tim Solso. All representing the companies they happen to be CEO's and chairman's to. Braly of WellPoint, Lechleiter of Eli Lilly and Company, Simon from Simon Property Group, Smulyan of Emmis Communications, and Solso from Cummins.
Apparently these companies and their presidents are concerned with the HJR 6 measure that went before the Indiana State Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, where the ban on same sex marriage and civil union was expected to pass with a GOP majority.
The executives wrote in their article in The Indianapolis Star, "As some of Indiana's largest public companies, we are profoundly concerned about this legislation and its effect on our employees and our state...our concerns are these:
*The legislation is not needed because Indiana already has a law banning same-sex marriage.
*The legislation represents government targeted discrimination against a specific group of people.
*The legislation is ambiguously written and we believe it will have a chilling and discriminating effect on many of our employees.
*The legislation sends a signal to the world that Indiana and its residents are less than welcoming people."
They do go on to say "discrimination is bad in any form. When it is expressed in the form of public policy, it not only makes for bad policy, but it makes for bad business.."
It was apparent that these companies opposed HJR 6. What took me back and made me almost gasp is when I read and re-read, "Our companies...believe it works against Indiana's sated desire to broaden its appeal to attract new business to the state...our success is directly affected by our ability to attract the best talent in the world...HJR 6 would severely limit our ability to bring those talented individuals home to Indiana."
OK! Hold Up! Stop and think about this for a minute. Do you really believe that allowing or disallowing same-sex marriage marriages or civil unions will effect who gets hired in the state of Indiana or any other state in this country right now. With a 8.9% unemployment rate can we really afford to turn anyone away? Whether they are gay or straight. We are not so narrow minded as Americans that we wont come here or anywhere in the U.S. where same-sex marriage has been banned. Do you truly believe that the millions of Americans desperately looking for work won't go just about anywhere to find work, including Indiana if the ban is lifted or not.
The company adds fuel to the fire by not only pointing out how they already provide "various domestic-partner benefits" but later state, "HJR 6 is a distraction that does nothing to solve our broader economic goals."
The Indiana House voted 70-26 to pass the ban on same sex marriage and civil unions. The amendment states, "Marriage. Provides that only marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Indiana. Provides that a legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized. This proposed amendment has not been previously agreed to by a general assembly." Though it did pass in the Indiana Senate it now must go to a separately-elected House and Senate for approval which wont vote on it until sometime in either 2013 or 2014.
In my opinion, these company executives should be ashamed of themselves. You cant say we provide domestic partner benefits and embrace diverse perspectives than slap all the employees and customers you serve in the face by saying that they are a distraction from broader economic issues. These are the people who buy your products, shop at your malls, and buy your drugs. And most of all work very hard for you.
If it were not for all Americans including the Gay and Lesbian community, you would not have jobs, a cushy salary, or a business to begin with. It is not the legislation that sends a signal to the world that Indiana and its residents are less than welcoming to all people. No it is CEO's like yourself that look at the bottom line instead of the full picture. You are walking a tight rope. On one hand you are standing up for the opposition of HJR 6 and on the other hand you are not taking a complete stand on discrimination of same-sex couples and civil unions. For example, your first concern, "legislation is not needed because we already have a law banning same-sex marriage. Why not say we don't need the ban anymore, period.
These companies are to be commended to some degree if they do have benefits in place for domestic partnerships. However, do not think for a moment we don't see through all the political correctness rhetoric. Ask yourselves, is it that you want the issue of HJR 6 to just go away, so the money you paid during all the political campaigns will be spent on issues or projects more palatable to you, or do you really actually care about same-sex marriage issues and civil unions? My guess is that since you believe it is a distraction...well you are intelligent well educated executives, I think you can figure it out.
It's a shame we as Americans can't have civil right issues heard because once again those who truly run the country...Corporate America...doesn't have time or it doesn't fit their itinerary.
No comments:
Post a Comment